<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Opportunityfire.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://opportunityfire.com/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://opportunityfire.com</link>
	<description>History, Gaming and More...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Out of the box: Blood and Bridges by Grill restaurant - Mountain restaurant - Fire grill restaurant</title>
		<link>http://opportunityfire.com/index.php/2009/02/12/out-of-the-box-blood-and-bridges/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Grill restaurant - Mountain restaurant - Fire grill restaurant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opportunityfire.com/?p=308#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] Out of the box: Blood and Bridges &#124; Opportunityfire.com 12 Feb 2009. Both Eisenbach Gap and Death of the First Panzer are.. a few paragraphs - but compared to older game systems like Mech War 2, they are very lightweight rules indeed.. Pingback. 2009 February 26. dropded permalink Out of the box: Blood and Bridges &#124; Opportunityfire.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Out of the box: Blood and Bridges | Opportunityfire.com 12 Feb 2009. Both Eisenbach Gap and Death of the First Panzer are.. a few paragraphs - but compared to older game systems like Mech War 2, they are very lightweight rules indeed.. Pingback. 2009 February 26. dropded permalink Out of the box: Blood and Bridges | Opportunityfire.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gaming the familiar unknown by Recommend an article, Gaming the familiar unknown &#124; Just another Facebook fan</title>
		<link>http://opportunityfire.com/index.php/2010/06/11/gaming-the-familiar-unknown/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Recommend an article, Gaming the familiar unknown &#124; Just another Facebook fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opportunityfire.com/?p=707#comment-82</guid>
		<description>[...] I saw a great article from this blog. Very good indeed.       No comments yet     Click here to cancel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I saw a great article from this blog. Very good indeed.       No comments yet     Click here to cancel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Gaming the familiar unknown by Gaming the familiar unknown &#124; Opportunityfire.com &#124; Industrial Scales and Weighing Systems</title>
		<link>http://opportunityfire.com/index.php/2010/06/11/gaming-the-familiar-unknown/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaming the familiar unknown &#124; Opportunityfire.com &#124; Industrial Scales and Weighing Systems</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opportunityfire.com/?p=707#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more from the original source: Gaming the familiar unknown &#124; Opportunityfire.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the original source: Gaming the familiar unknown | Opportunityfire.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wrapping up Horus Heresy by dropded</title>
		<link>http://opportunityfire.com/index.php/2010/05/11/wrapping-up-horus-heresy/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>dropded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opportunityfire.com/?p=702#comment-79</guid>
		<description>So, now that you are back from the sea, Cap'n, are you going to put away this HH nonsense and pull out a &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; wargame?

Nonsense comments (unrendered cyrllic?) with an embedded link to a .ru domain.  THOSE look legit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, now that you are back from the sea, Cap&#8217;n, are you going to put away this HH nonsense and pull out a <i>real</i> wargame?</p>
<p>Nonsense comments (unrendered cyrllic?) with an embedded link to a .ru domain.  THOSE look legit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Out of the box: Bataan! by dropded</title>
		<link>http://opportunityfire.com/index.php/2010/04/02/out-of-the-box-bataan/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>dropded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://opportunityfire.com/?p=651#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Re: Silent War.  It's not so much the accounting, the maths is kinda simple, it's the  endless wristage and chit pulling.  The amount of work involved combined with the morale crushing combo of shitty torpedoes and tough campaign quotas has kept this off the table.  It does generate good narrative and gives plausible results (i.e. amount of tonnage sunk and subs lost will stay within one standard deviation of the historical mean).  I'll probably play it again at some point.

Re: Bataan.  I've given this one a pass because it's a VvB game, the few of which I've played seem to burden the player with a lot of detail in the combat system for little return (I'm thinking mostly of Manstein's Backhand Blow, which the developer of Bataan was a sharp critic of, and the EFS games, which I have in the queue).  I'm always ready to be persuaded to buy a game though, so I'm interested in your further thoughts.

And speaking of overburdened combat systems, I'm currently playing NES Overlord, which I like despite it being burdened by Killing Grounds overwrought combat system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Silent War.  It&#8217;s not so much the accounting, the maths is kinda simple, it&#8217;s the  endless wristage and chit pulling.  The amount of work involved combined with the morale crushing combo of shitty torpedoes and tough campaign quotas has kept this off the table.  It does generate good narrative and gives plausible results (i.e. amount of tonnage sunk and subs lost will stay within one standard deviation of the historical mean).  I&#8217;ll probably play it again at some point.</p>
<p>Re: Bataan.  I&#8217;ve given this one a pass because it&#8217;s a VvB game, the few of which I&#8217;ve played seem to burden the player with a lot of detail in the combat system for little return (I&#8217;m thinking mostly of Manstein&#8217;s Backhand Blow, which the developer of Bataan was a sharp critic of, and the EFS games, which I have in the queue).  I&#8217;m always ready to be persuaded to buy a game though, so I&#8217;m interested in your further thoughts.</p>
<p>And speaking of overburdened combat systems, I&#8217;m currently playing NES Overlord, which I like despite it being burdened by Killing Grounds overwrought combat system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
